State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation (No 3) [2011] NSWCA 200
Given the centrality and relevance of the documents and the number and complexity of remaining documents subject to public interest immunity claims, together with the lack of prejudice to the public interest, appointment of a special counsel is warranted to assist the Court efficiently and fairly resolve the outstanding issues. Disclosure of designated document excerpts is ordered.
- Parties
- Appellant/first Cross Respondent: State of New South Wales; First Respondent/second Cross Respondent: Public Transport Ticketing Corporation ACN 57 443 320 873; Second Respondent/first Cross Claimant: Integrated Transit Solutions Limited ACN 19 085 661 865; Third Respondent/second Cross Claimant: ERG Limited ABN 23 009 112 725
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Decision
- Outcome
- Orders made for partial disclosure and appointment of a special counsel to assist with further public interest immunity claims; costs of special counsel to be paid in the first instance by ERG (Second and Third Respondents); additional procedural directions given regarding the appointment and role of the special...
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Public Interest Immunity, Disclosure of Documents, Inherent Jurisdiction, Appointment of Special Counsel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of New South Wales
Appellant/first Cross Respondent
Public Transport Ticketing Corporation ACN 57 443 320 873
First Respondent/second Cross Respondent
Integrated Transit Solutions Limited ACN 19 085 661 865
Second Respondent/first Cross Claimant
ERG Limited ABN 23 009 112 725
Third Respondent/second Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should order disclosure of certain documents subject to public interest immunity claims after pleadings were amended
- 2 Whether the appointment of a special counsel is appropriate to assist the Court in resolving claims of public interest immunity
Ratio Decidendi
Given the centrality and relevance of the documents and the number and complexity of remaining documents subject to public interest immunity claims, together with the lack of prejudice to the public interest, appointment of a special counsel is warranted to assist the Court efficiently and fairly resolve the outstanding issues. Disclosure of designated document excerpts is ordered.
Court Disposition
Orders made for partial disclosure and appointment of a special counsel to assist with further public interest immunity claims; costs of special counsel to be paid in the first instance by ERG (Second and Third Respondents); additional procedural directions given regarding the appointment and role of the special...
Orders
- The following documents to be disclosed: (a) Paras 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.6, 4.8 in document D1; (b) Paras 5.1-5.3 and headings in Item 5 of documents D2-D4; (c) Paras 3.1-3.7 of Item 3 in documents D5-D6.
- The Registrar of the Court of Appeal will request the Attorney-General to nominate counsel as special counsel in the proceedings to resolve the issue of public interest immunity expeditiously.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment