Naismith v Mcgovern [1953] HCA 59
Taxation prosecutions under Part VII of the Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act 1936-1951, though penal in nature, are to be prosecuted according to the usual practice and procedure of the Court in civil cases. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to an order for discovery against the Commissioner of Taxation, and s. 64 of the Judiciary Act 1903-1950 applies. It is not a valid objection that one party may be immune from an equivalent order; the Court may exercise discretion in making procedural orders under s. 237.
- Parties
- Appellant; Defendant: Herbert Arthur James Naismith; Respondent; Plaintiff: Patrick Silvester McGovern, Commissioner of Taxation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 1953
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Queensland
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery in Civil Proceedings, Penal Actions, Application of Judiciary Act to Tax Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Herbert Arthur James Naismith
Appellant; Defendant
Patrick Silvester McGovern, Commissioner of Taxation
Respondent; Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Queensland
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant in a taxation prosecution under the Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act 1936-1951 is entitled to discovery against the Commissioner of Taxation.
- 2 Whether such proceedings are civil or criminal for procedural purposes, especially relating to discovery.
- 3 Whether s. 64 of the Judiciary Act 1903-1950 applies to such proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
Taxation prosecutions under Part VII of the Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act 1936-1951, though penal in nature, are to be prosecuted according to the usual practice and procedure of the Court in civil cases. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to an order for discovery against the Commissioner of Taxation, and s. 64 of the Judiciary Act 1903-1950 applies. It is not a valid objection that one party may be immune from an equivalent order; the Court may exercise discretion in making procedural orders under s. 237.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order below set aside.
- Plaintiff to comply with the notice of discovery within twenty-eight days after service of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment