Kandos Coomber Colliery Co Ltd v Bromwich [1948] HCA 43

Kandos Coomber Colliery Co Ltd v Bromwich [1948] HCA 43

The majority held that the worker had not proved that incapacity for work resulted from the employment-related pulmonary fibrosis. Because the Commission did not find that pulmonary fibrosis caused incapacity before the unrelated cardio-vascular degeneration caused total incapacity, and because the burden of proving resulting incapacity rested on the worker rather than on the employer, the Commission erred in law in making an award.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal on Case Stated / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From a Decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs.
Legal Topics
['disease Contracted by Gradual Process' 'incapacity for Work' 'burden of Proof' 'case Stated' 'causation']
["workers' Compensation Law"] ['disease Contracted by Gradual Process' 'incapacity for Work' 'burden of Proof' 'case Stated' 'causation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Workers' Compensation Appeal on Case Stated / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From a Decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in law in awarding compensation where the worker had employment-related pulmonary fibrosis causing partial incapacity and non-employment cardio-vascular degeneration causing total incapacity." 'Whether the worker bore the burden of proving that incapacity for work resulted from the employment-related disease.' 'Whether compensation was payable when it had not been ascertained whether total incapacity from cardio-vascular degeneration preceded incapacity from pulmonary fibrosis.']

Ratio Decidendi

The majority held that the worker had not proved that incapacity for work resulted from the employment-related pulmonary fibrosis. Because the Commission did not find that pulmonary fibrosis caused incapacity before the unrelated cardio-vascular degeneration caused total incapacity, and because the burden of proving resulting incapacity rested on the worker rather than on the employer, the Commission erred in law in making an award.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal allowed with costs.' 'Order of Supreme Court discharged.' 'In lieu thereof second question in case stated answered Yes.' 'Other questions not answered.' 'Respondent to pay costs of appellant before the Commission and the Supreme Court.']