R v Slewa [2003] NSWCCA 50

R v Slewa [2003] NSWCCA 50

The evidence against the appellant, viewed as a whole, was sufficient to entitle the jury to convict; any discrepancies in the complainant's account were minor and did not outweigh the accurate and detailed aspects of vehicle and attacker identification. The absence of a lies direction did not result in a miscarriage of justice, as it was not requested for tactical reasons and the directions given were appropriate. Although the summing up did not use precise terms regarding the car's identification, it was sufficient and no miscarriage of justice resulted.

Parties
Appellant: Disho Slewa; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Conviction Appeal / Final Determination on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Appeals, Jury Directions, Unreasonable Verdicts
Criminal Law Sexual Assault Appeals Jury Directions Unreasonable Verdicts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Disho Slewa

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Conviction Appeal / Final Determination on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the jury verdict was unreasonable and not supported by evidence
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a separate direction on lies constituted a miscarriage of justice
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge failed to direct the jury appropriately on the requirement to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant's car was the one described by the complainant

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence against the appellant, viewed as a whole, was sufficient to entitle the jury to convict; any discrepancies in the complainant's account were minor and did not outweigh the accurate and detailed aspects of vehicle and attacker identification. The absence of a lies direction did not result in a miscarriage of justice, as it was not requested for tactical reasons and the directions given were appropriate. Although the summing up did not use precise terms regarding the car's identification, it was sufficient and no miscarriage of justice resulted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed