R v GOEL (No 2) [2011] NSWDC 144

R v GOEL (No 2) [2011] NSWDC 144

The offender was knowingly part of a scheme to defraud approximately $180,000 from the Commonwealth by causing forty-one false tax returns to be lodged with inflated deductions, and his guilty plea was entered only after trial had commenced, warranting a head sentence of five years imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years.

Parties
Prosecutor: The Crown; Offender: Dinker Goel
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 September 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
Sentenced to imprisonment for five years with a non-parole period of two years.
Legal Topics
Dishonestly Cause a Loss to the Commonwealth, Tax Fraud, Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Prosecutor

Dinker Goel

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

  1. 1 Extent of offender's dishonesty in preparation and lodging of false tax returns
  2. 2 Factual dispute regarding involvement in fraudulent deductions
  3. 3 Appropriate sentence given multiplicity of offences and factual findings

Ratio Decidendi

The offender was knowingly part of a scheme to defraud approximately $180,000 from the Commonwealth by causing forty-one false tax returns to be lodged with inflated deductions, and his guilty plea was entered only after trial had commenced, warranting a head sentence of five years imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years.

Court Disposition

Sentenced to imprisonment for five years with a non-parole period of two years.

Orders

  • Imprisonment for counts one to ten: two years from 9 September 2011.
  • Imprisonment for counts eleven to twenty: two years from 9 September 2012.