R v Howard [2003] NSWSC 1248
Given Mr Howard’s guilty plea, voluntary disclosure, and extensive past and future assistance to authorities, a total sentence of imprisonment of 3 years (with respective discounts on each count) is warranted, but the sentence is suspended under s20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 in light of his undertaking to provide future assistance. If Mr Howard fails to honour the undertaking, the custodial sentence will be activated.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Accused: William Herbert Howard
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Suspended sentence of imprisonment, subject to future cooperation.
- Legal Topics
- Dishonesty Offences, Breach of Trust, White Collar Crime, Sentence Discount, Assistance to Authorities, Suspended Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
William Herbert Howard
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for offences of dishonesty and breach of trust under the Corporations Act 2001?
- 2 Should sentence be mitigated based on a guilty plea, assistance to authorities, and other discounts?
- 3 Should the sentences be suspended in light of future assistance?
Ratio Decidendi
Given Mr Howard’s guilty plea, voluntary disclosure, and extensive past and future assistance to authorities, a total sentence of imprisonment of 3 years (with respective discounts on each count) is warranted, but the sentence is suspended under s20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 in light of his undertaking to provide future assistance. If Mr Howard fails to honour the undertaking, the custodial sentence will be activated.
Court Disposition
Suspended sentence of imprisonment, subject to future cooperation.
Orders
- Count 1: Imprisonment for 1 year 9 months commencing 23 December 2003 and expiring 22 September 2005.
- Count 2: Imprisonment for 2 years commencing 23 December 2004 and expiring 22 December 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment