Hebbel Constructions Pty Limited v Bitar Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 917

Hebbel Constructions Pty Limited v Bitar Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 917

Hebbel is not entitled to recover loans advanced for construction costs since, under the construction contract, Hebbel was contractually obligated as builder to complete the works and the partnership is not liable for those amounts; only non-construction project expenses are potentially recoverable as partnership advances. The partnership between Hebbel and Bitar is dissolved due to irretrievable breakdown in relations and deficient financial records, and the assets are to be managed and sold by an appointed receiver. A referee is appointed to determine remaining accounting questions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment and Orders Dissolving Partnership, Appointing Receiver and Referee
Outcome
Partnership dissolved; receiver and referee appointed; repayment claims for construction-related loans rejected; assets to be wound up and sold; referee to determine remaining partnership accounting matters.
Legal Topics
['dissolution and Winding Up of Partnership' 'joint Venture Accounting' 'construction Contract Liability' 'receiver Appointment' 'referee Appointment' 'home Building Act 1989 (nsw) Issues' 'gst Refunds']
['equity' 'partnership'] ['dissolution and Winding Up of Partnership' 'joint Venture Accounting' 'construction Contract Liability' 'receiver Appointment' 'referee Appointment' 'home Building Act 1989 (nsw) Issues' 'gst Refunds']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Final Judgment and Orders Dissolving Partnership, Appointing Receiver and Referee

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether partnership between Hebbel and Bitar should be dissolved and wound up' 'Entitlement to repayment of alleged loans advanced to partnership by Hebbel' 'Identity of builder and legal responsibility for construction contract' 'Whether construction contract was abandoned or remained in force' 'Impact of lack of building licence and Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)' 'Entitlement to partnership assets, profits, and liabilities accounting' 'Appointment of receiver and referee']

Ratio Decidendi

Hebbel is not entitled to recover loans advanced for construction costs since, under the construction contract, Hebbel was contractually obligated as builder to complete the works and the partnership is not liable for those amounts; only non-construction project expenses are potentially recoverable as partnership advances. The partnership between Hebbel and Bitar is dissolved due to irretrievable breakdown in relations and deficient financial records, and the assets are to be managed and sold by an appointed receiver. A referee is appointed to determine remaining accounting questions.

Court Disposition

Partnership dissolved; receiver and referee appointed; repayment claims for construction-related loans rejected; assets to be wound up and sold; referee to determine remaining partnership accounting matters.

Orders

  • ['Declaration that partnership is dissolved as of the date of judgment' 'Appointment of Mr Friskin as receiver and manager to wind up partnership affairs, including sale of ten units' 'Appointment of Mr Gwynne as referee to determine specified accounting and rent questions' 'Referee to determine amounts of GST...