Henderson v Henderson [1948] HCA 15

Henderson v Henderson [1948] HCA 15

The wife's adultery meant that the court was not bound to pronounce a decree, but it did not bar relief. The factors favouring a decree on the second petition were compelling: the husband's adultery was proved, reconciliation was impossible, the wife and D. wished to marry, the wife had been chaste since August 1945, the children might have a real home if a decree were granted, and maintaining the marriage would not support respect for marriage. The trial judge gave undue or unreal weight to the supposed encouragement of immorality from granting relief, and the majority of the Full Court was justified in interfering. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Divorce Appeal / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From a Decree of Divorce Granted on the Second Petition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['divorce' 'adultery' 'discretionary Bar' 'dissolution of Marriage' 'exercise of Judicial Discretion']
['family Law' 'appellate Law'] ['divorce' 'adultery' 'discretionary Bar' 'dissolution of Marriage' 'exercise of Judicial Discretion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Divorce Appeal / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From a Decree of Divorce Granted on the Second Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether a decree for dissolution should be pronounced on the wife's petition based on the husband's adultery notwithstanding the wife's admitted adultery." "Whether the trial judge's refusal to exercise discretion in favour of the wife should stand."]

Ratio Decidendi

The wife's adultery meant that the court was not bound to pronounce a decree, but it did not bar relief. The factors favouring a decree on the second petition were compelling: the husband's adultery was proved, reconciliation was impossible, the wife and D. wished to marry, the wife had been chaste since August 1945, the children might have a real home if a decree were granted, and maintaining the marriage would not support respect for marriage. The trial judge gave undue or unreal weight to the supposed encouragement of immorality from granting relief, and the majority of the Full Court was justified in interfering. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']