Coulton v Coulton [2008] NSWSC 910

Coulton v Coulton [2008] NSWSC 910

The plaintiff has an arguable case that the Fifth Defendant, having allegedly knowingly participated in breaches of fiduciary duty by other defendants regarding partnership property and its transfer to her, may be liable as a constructive trustee, notwithstanding arguments on indefeasibility and release. Therefore, summary dismissal is not appropriate.

Parties
Plaintiff: Dixie Martha Coulton; First Defendant: Keith Alfred Coulton; Second Defendant: Samuel Alfred Coulton; Third Defendant: Benjamin Keith Coulton; Fourth Defendant: David Boyd Coulton; Fifth Defendant: Kim Alexandra Coulton
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 September 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal by Fifth Defendant
Outcome
Application for summary dismissal by the Fifth Defendant dismissed; costs ordered against Fifth Defendant; leave granted for amendment of pleading; matter stood over.
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Constructive Trust, Fiduciary Duties, Indefeasibility of Title, Knowing Assistance, Partnerships, Barnes V Addy Liability
Equity Property Law Civil Procedure Summary Dismissal Constructive Trust Fiduciary Duties Indefeasibility of Title Knowing Assistance +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dixie Martha Coulton

Plaintiff

Keith Alfred Coulton

First Defendant

Samuel Alfred Coulton

Second Defendant

Benjamin Keith Coulton

Third Defendant

David Boyd Coulton

Fourth Defendant

Kim Alexandra Coulton

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal by Fifth Defendant

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's claim against the Fifth Defendant discloses a reasonable cause of action justifying refusal of summary dismissal
  2. 2 Whether indefeasibility of title under the Real Property Act 1900 defeats the plaintiff’s claim of a constructive trust over land and water rights held by the Fifth Defendant
  3. 3 Whether a release of a fiduciary also effects a release of a person who knowingly participates in the wrongful conduct of the fiduciary

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff has an arguable case that the Fifth Defendant, having allegedly knowingly participated in breaches of fiduciary duty by other defendants regarding partnership property and its transfer to her, may be liable as a constructive trustee, notwithstanding arguments on indefeasibility and release. Therefore, summary dismissal is not appropriate.

Court Disposition

Application for summary dismissal by the Fifth Defendant dismissed; costs ordered against Fifth Defendant; leave granted for amendment of pleading; matter stood over.

Orders

  • Notice of motion filed by the Fifth Defendant on 11 February 2008 dismissed.
  • Fifth Defendant to pay the costs of the Plaintiff of the notice of motion.