Regina v Django O'Hara [2005] NSWCCA 97

Regina v Django O'Hara [2005] NSWCCA 97

The application was refused because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the substantial delay between sentence in 1996 and filing in April 2002, the proposed appeal was not shown to be strong enough to overcome the difficulty caused by that delay, and the delay created a risk of injustice to the Crown in responding to old and insufficiently identified allegations of officer impropriety.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to Bring an Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Application for an extension of time within which to bring an application for leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal Against Sentence' 'gross Delay' 'harsh Custodial Conditions' 'post Sentence Circumstances' 'miscarriage of Justice']
['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure' 'sentencing'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal Against Sentence' 'gross Delay' 'harsh Custodial Conditions' 'post Sentence Circumstances' 'miscarriage of Justice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to Bring an Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to bring an application for leave to appeal against sentence more than five years after the time limited by the rules had expired.' 'Whether the proposed appeal based on allegedly harsh custodial conditions and failure to follow sentencing recommendations was sufficiently strong to justify extending time despite gross delay.' 'Whether alleged post-sentence administrative circumstances in custody were amenable to correction by the Court of Criminal Appeal or were matters for the Executive.']

Ratio Decidendi

The application was refused because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the substantial delay between sentence in 1996 and filing in April 2002, the proposed appeal was not shown to be strong enough to overcome the difficulty caused by that delay, and the delay created a risk of injustice to the Crown in responding to old and insufficiently identified allegations of officer impropriety.

Court Disposition

Application for an extension of time within which to bring an application for leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time within which to bring an application for leave to appeal against the sentence is refused.']