DJH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1885

DJH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1885

The applicant's draft notice of appeal did not sufficiently particularise grounds to establish jurisdictional error, and there was no arguable basis for concluding that the IAA decision was affected by jurisdictional error; accordingly, the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: DJH16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Extension of Time Application
Outcome
Application for extension of time dismissed, with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time to Appeal, Jurisdictional Error, Protection Visa, Immigration Assessment Authority Review
Migration Law Administrative Law Extension of Time to Appeal Jurisdictional Error Protection Visa Immigration Assessment Authority Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DJH16

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Immigration Assessment Authority

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Extension of Time Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in bringing the appeal
  2. 2 Whether there are sufficient prospects of success of the appeal to warrant the grant of an extension of time
  3. 3 Whether the IAA's decision was affected by jurisdictional error

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's draft notice of appeal did not sufficiently particularise grounds to establish jurisdictional error, and there was no arguable basis for concluding that the IAA decision was affected by jurisdictional error; accordingly, the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed, with costs.

Orders

  • The application for an extension of time filed on 12 June 2018 be dismissed.
  • The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed.