DKI16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 629

DKI16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 629

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not establish any appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision. His single ground of appeal did not identify an arguable appealable error and, even if read as challenging the finding that the Tribunal made no jurisdictional error, it took the matter no further because the sole judicial review ground in the Federal Circuit Court was only disagreement with the Tribunal's decision and not a proper ground demonstrating jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From a Judgment and Orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed, with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'administrative Appeals Tribunal' 'appeal From Federal Circuit Court']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'administrative Appeals Tribunal' 'appeal From Federal Circuit Court']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From a Judgment and Orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in finding that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision was not affected by jurisdictional error.' "Whether the appellant's disagreement with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal's decision disclosed a proper ground of judicial review or appealable error."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not establish any appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision. His single ground of appeal did not identify an arguable appealable error and, even if read as challenging the finding that the Tribunal made no jurisdictional error, it took the matter no further because the sole judicial review ground in the Federal Circuit Court was only disagreement with the Tribunal's decision and not a proper ground demonstrating jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed."]