DLV17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 801

DLV17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 801

The Authority did not fail to give real and genuine consideration to the country information and submissions; its findings were open and supported by material; no jurisdictional error was demonstrated; and the appeal grounds must fail.

Parties
Appellant: DLV17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review of Migration Decisions, Safe Haven Enterprise Visa, Country Information Consideration, Complementary Protection, Jurisdictional Error
Migration Law Administrative Law Human Rights Law Judicial Review of Migration Decisions Safe Haven Enterprise Visa Country Information Consideration Complementary Protection Jurisdictional Error

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DLV17

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Immigration Assessment Authority

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to give real and genuine consideration to country information relevant to risk of harm on return to Sri Lanka.
  2. 2 Whether the Authority failed to consider that the risk of harm was heightened by the appellant disobeying reporting orders on departing Sri Lanka.
  3. 3 Whether the Authority failed to consider country information about the torture and ill-treatment of Tamils by security forces.

Ratio Decidendi

The Authority did not fail to give real and genuine consideration to the country information and submissions; its findings were open and supported by material; no jurisdictional error was demonstrated; and the appeal grounds must fail.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed.
  • The appellant pay the first respondent's costs to be assessed in default of agreement.