Regina v. DMC [2002] NSWCCA 513

Regina v. DMC [2002] NSWCCA 513

The appeal was allowed because the jury directions on consent and belief in consent for count 5, and on intention to hold irrespective of consent for count 4, were deficient; the appellant lost a reasonable chance of acquittal due to these failures, amounting to a miscarriage of justice.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; convictions quashed
Legal Topics
['assault' 'kidnapping' 'consent' 'intent' 'jury Directions']
['criminal Law'] ['assault' 'kidnapping' 'consent' 'intent' 'jury Directions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether physical contact constituted assault or was an ordinary incident of social intercourse' 'Whether implied consent or belief in consent was sufficiently considered' "Whether intention to hold in kidnapping includes holding irrespective of victim's consent" "Whether the trial judge's directions regarding consent and intention were deficient"]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because the jury directions on consent and belief in consent for count 5, and on intention to hold irrespective of consent for count 4, were deficient; the appellant lost a reasonable chance of acquittal due to these failures, amounting to a miscarriage of justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; convictions quashed

Orders

  • ['Convictions on counts 4 and 5 quashed' 'Appeal allowed']