Devic v Motor Accident of Authority of NSW [2009] NSWSC 1289
Assessor Ford failed to have regard to relevant and material contemporaneous medical records as part of his statutory function, and this error may have affected the outcome. The error was sufficient to warrant certiorari and remittal.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dmitar Devic; First Defendant: Motor Accidents Authority of NSW; Second Defendant: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders granted for certiorari, matter remitted to First Defendant, costs to Plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Medical Assessment, Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, Relevant and Irrelevant Considerations, Duty to Act Judicially and Reasonably
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dmitar Devic
Plaintiff
Motor Accidents Authority of NSW
First Defendant
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Assessor Ford took into account irrelevant considerations in relying on Janet Ashpole's reasons
- 2 Whether Assessor Ford failed to take into account relevant considerations, namely contemporaneous medical records
- 3 Whether Assessor Ford failed to act judicially or reasonably in refusing referral for further medical assessment
Ratio Decidendi
Assessor Ford failed to have regard to relevant and material contemporaneous medical records as part of his statutory function, and this error may have affected the outcome. The error was sufficient to warrant certiorari and remittal.
Court Disposition
Orders granted for certiorari, matter remitted to First Defendant, costs to Plaintiff.
Orders
- An order in the nature of certiorari removing into the Court the determination of Assessor Ford made 31 July 2008 in CARS Matter No. 2008/0415KM and quashing that determination.
- The matter be remitted to the First Defendant to be determined in accordance with the reasons of the Court and according to law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment