DMO17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 906
The proposed grounds of appeal lack merit and are not reasonably arguable. The applicant failed to demonstrate any material jurisdictional error by the Authority or primary judge, and leave to appeal is refused. Application is dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: DMO17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Protection Visa, Fresh Grounds of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DMO17
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Immigration Assessment Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's interlocutory dismissal of the applicant's judicial review application
- 2 Whether grounds advanced by the applicant are reasonably arguable and constitute jurisdictional error
- 3 Whether substantial injustice would occur if leave is refused
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed grounds of appeal lack merit and are not reasonably arguable. The applicant failed to demonstrate any material jurisdictional error by the Authority or primary judge, and leave to appeal is refused. Application is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
- The Applicant pay the First Respondent's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment