DNL18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1404
None of the appellant's grounds of appeal demonstrated jurisdictional error by the Immigration Assessment Authority; the IAA considered all relevant material, properly addressed complementary protection, and no apprehended bias by the relevant decision-maker was established. The appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review of Migration Decisions' 'apprehended Bias' 'complementary Protection' 'procedural Fairness' 'people Smuggling']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to deal with the Appellant's claim that he would suffer harm and ignored relevant material" "Whether the Appellant should be granted leave to argue apprehended bias by the Minister's delegate" 'Whether the claim for a complementary protection visa was dealt with appropriately']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the appellant's grounds of appeal demonstrated jurisdictional error by the Immigration Assessment Authority; the IAA considered all relevant material, properly addressed complementary protection, and no apprehended bias by the relevant decision-maker was established. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment