Borgese v Papasidero [2006] NSWSC 407

Borgese v Papasidero [2006] NSWSC 407

Although the case was borderline, the plaintiff's real expectation arising from promises by his parents, his contributions to the farm, his poor circumstances, and the absence of competing claims meant that provision of only one sixth of the estate, even with additional gifts to his children, was not adequate. A wise and just testator should have given the plaintiff one half of the estate while leaving the benefactions to Benilda Papasidero and Luciana Borgese intact.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Provision Under the Family Provision Act 1982 Out of the Estate of Giuseppe Borgese / Ex Tempore Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff granted further provision; plaintiff to receive one half of the estate in lieu of the provision made by the will.
Legal Topics
['adequacy of Testamentary Provision' 'mutual Wills' 'estate Distribution' 'competing Claims of Beneficiaries']
['succession' 'family Provision'] ['adequacy of Testamentary Provision' 'mutual Wills' 'estate Distribution' 'competing Claims of Beneficiaries']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Provision Under the Family Provision Act 1982 Out of the Estate of Giuseppe Borgese / Ex Tempore Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the testator made proper provision for the plaintiff under the Family Provision Act 1982.' 'If proper provision was not made, what provision should have been made for the plaintiff out of the estate.' "Whether the plaintiff's expectation arising from alleged mutual wills, his work on the farm, and his circumstances justified further provision in the absence of competing claims."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the case was borderline, the plaintiff's real expectation arising from promises by his parents, his contributions to the farm, his poor circumstances, and the absence of competing claims meant that provision of only one sixth of the estate, even with additional gifts to his children, was not adequate. A wise and just testator should have given the plaintiff one half of the estate while leaving the benefactions to Benilda Papasidero and Luciana Borgese intact.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff granted further provision; plaintiff to receive one half of the estate in lieu of the provision made by the will.

Orders

  • ['That in lieu of the provision made for the plaintiff by the will of the late Giuseppe Borgese, the plaintiff receive one half of the estate.' 'This order is not to affect the benefaction in the will in favour of Benilda Papasidero or Luciana Borgese but otherwise is to be borne rateably by the beneficiaries.'...