R v Galati [2003] NSWCCA 148
While the sentencing judge took into account the guilty pleas, the sentences did not demonstrably reflect any allowance for the first period of pre-sentence custody. This was an error requiring the sentences to be set aside and re-imposed to give credit for the pre-sentence custody.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'drugs' 'guilty Plea' 'utilitarian Value' 'pre Sentence Custody' 'sentence Calculation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to discount the applicant's sentences for the utilitarian value of his guilty pleas" "Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to demonstrably take into account the applicant's pre-sentence custody from 16 October 2001 to 11 December 2001"]
Ratio Decidendi
While the sentencing judge took into account the guilty pleas, the sentences did not demonstrably reflect any allowance for the first period of pre-sentence custody. This was an error requiring the sentences to be set aside and re-imposed to give credit for the pre-sentence custody.
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence allowed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal against sentences allowed' 'Original sentences quashed' 'For count one, fixed term of imprisonment of one year commencing 23 November 2001' 'For count two, fixed term of imprisonment of one year commencing 23 November 2001' 'For count three, term of imprisonment of three years with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment