Natoli v R [2009] NSWCCA 36

Natoli v R [2009] NSWCCA 36

The Court held that the aggregate sentence imposed by the sentencing judge was manifestly excessive, especially considering the offences were committed within a short period, were opportunistic, the applicant's youth, lack of criminal history, and cognitive impairment. The appeal was allowed in part, with the commencement dates of some sentences adjusted and the non-parole period recalculated to properly reflect total criminality.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'armed Robbery' 'manifest Excess' 'accumulation of Sentences' 'total Criminality']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'armed Robbery' 'manifest Excess' 'accumulation of Sentences' 'total Criminality']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Sentence Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in determining the non-parole period' 'Whether the aggregate sentence was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the aggregate sentence imposed by the sentencing judge was manifestly excessive, especially considering the offences were committed within a short period, were opportunistic, the applicant's youth, lack of criminal history, and cognitive impairment. The appeal was allowed in part, with the commencement dates of some sentences adjusted and the non-parole period recalculated to properly reflect total criminality.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal allowed in part' 'Vary the sentences for counts 4 and 5 so that they commence on 30 November 2007 and expire on 29 May 2012' 'Vary the sentence for the committal offence so that it commences on 30 November 2008 and expires on 29 August 2012' 'Quash the sentence on count 1 and in...