Kanak, Dominic Wy v Pipeline Authority & Ors Kanak, Dominic Wy v Comer, Raymond & Ors [1996] FCA 317
The proceedings were summarily dismissed because the applicant lacked standing as an 'interested person' under s 127 of the Lands Acquisition Act 1989, had no relevant proprietary or legal interest in the land, and no reasonable cause of action or triable controversy was disclosed; accordingly, the matters must fail.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Dismissal Applications (motions) in Federal Court Proceedings / Judgment on Motions for Summary Dismissal and Related Relief
- Outcome
- Both proceedings (NG 753 of 1995 and NG 37 of 1996) dismissed generally with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['standing' 'summary Dismissal' 'mandamus' 'prohibition' 'interests in Land' 'native Title Act 1993 (cth)' 'lands Acquisition Act 1989 (cth)' 'judiciary Act 1903 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summary Dismissal Applications (motions) in Federal Court Proceedings / Judgment on Motions for Summary Dismissal and Related Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant has standing as an 'interested person' under s 127 of the Lands Acquisition Act 1989" 'Whether the matters disclose any reasonable cause of action justifying relief under s 127 of the Lands Acquisition Act, s 39B of the Judiciary Act or otherwise' 'Whether the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious']
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were summarily dismissed because the applicant lacked standing as an 'interested person' under s 127 of the Lands Acquisition Act 1989, had no relevant proprietary or legal interest in the land, and no reasonable cause of action or triable controversy was disclosed; accordingly, the matters must fail.
Court Disposition
Both proceedings (NG 753 of 1995 and NG 37 of 1996) dismissed generally with costs
Orders
- ['The proceedings are dismissed generally with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment