WYkanak v Metropolitan Local Aboriginal & Land Council [2000] FCA 251

WYkanak v Metropolitan Local Aboriginal & Land Council [2000] FCA 251

The proceedings were dismissed as an abuse of process because the applicant was impermissibly seeking to collaterally challenge final decisions that conclusively denied him standing in relation to the native title determination; no legal basis existed for his notice of appeal or claims for relief.

Parties
Applicant: Dominic Wykanak; First Respondent: Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Lands Council; Second Respondent: New South Wales Aboriginal Lands Council; Third Respondent: Registrar of the National Native Title Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 March 2000
Procedural Posture
Motion to Dismiss Appeal/notice of Appeal / Judgment on Motion to Dismiss/summary Dismissal
Outcome
Applicant's proceedings dismissed as abuse of process; costs ordered against applicant on full indemnity basis.
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Standing, Native Title Determinations, Procedural Dismissal, Appeals
Civil Procedure Native Title Abuse of Process Standing Native Title Determinations Procedural Dismissal Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominic Wykanak

Applicant

Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Lands Council

First Respondent

New South Wales Aboriginal Lands Council

Second Respondent

Registrar of the National Native Title Tribunal

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Motion to Dismiss Appeal/notice of Appeal / Judgment on Motion to Dismiss/summary Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's 'Notice of Appeal' constitutes an abuse of process as a collateral challenge to final judgments
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has standing to bring the proceedings
  3. 3 Whether there is any legal basis for appeal/review against the actions of the President or Registrar of the Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

The proceedings were dismissed as an abuse of process because the applicant was impermissibly seeking to collaterally challenge final decisions that conclusively denied him standing in relation to the native title determination; no legal basis existed for his notice of appeal or claims for relief.

Court Disposition

Applicant's proceedings dismissed as abuse of process; costs ordered against applicant on full indemnity basis.

Orders

  • The motion of the second respondent of 16 July 1999 be granted.
  • The applicant's appeal filed on 11 May 1998 be dismissed.