SafeWork NSW v Dominion Global Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 199
Dominion Global Pty Ltd breached its duty under s 19(1) of the WHS Act by failing to identify and mitigate a known risk of falling into a void, exposing workers to foreseeable and serious risk of injury. The plea of guilty and mitigating circumstances, including its exemplary safety record and remedial action, warranted a reduced sentence, but the offence's seriousness required a substantial penalty for deterrence.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork New South Wales; Defendant: Dominion Global Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentence
- Outcome
- The defendant is convicted. A fine of $400,000.00 is reduced by 25% for the utilitarian value of the plea. The defendant must pay a fine of $300,000.00. 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor. The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed in the sum of $31,362.20.
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Persons Undertaking Business, Risk of Death or Serious Injury, Sentencing, Mitigating Factors, Aggravating Factors, General Deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Objective Seriousness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork New South Wales
Prosecutor
Dominion Global Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Did Dominion Global Pty Ltd breach its obligations under s 32 and s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)?
- 2 Was the risk to workers foreseeable and known?
- 3 What is the objective seriousness of the offence?
Ratio Decidendi
Dominion Global Pty Ltd breached its duty under s 19(1) of the WHS Act by failing to identify and mitigate a known risk of falling into a void, exposing workers to foreseeable and serious risk of injury. The plea of guilty and mitigating circumstances, including its exemplary safety record and remedial action, warranted a reduced sentence, but the offence's seriousness required a substantial penalty for deterrence.
Court Disposition
The defendant is convicted. A fine of $400,000.00 is reduced by 25% for the utilitarian value of the plea. The defendant must pay a fine of $300,000.00. 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor. The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed in the sum of $31,362.20.
Orders
- Defendant convicted.
- Defendant to pay a fine of $300,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment