Wride v IP Australia [2004] FCA 282

Wride v IP Australia [2004] FCA 282

For the reasons published this day in the matter of Wride v Schulze (file number S 175 of 2002), except the reasons contained in paragraphs [48] to [52], the Court struck out the amended statement of claim and dismissed the applicant's application.

Parties
Applicant: Donald Charles Wride; Respondent: IP Australia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment and Orders
Outcome
application dismissed

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donald Charles Wride

Applicant

IP Australia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Judgment and Orders

Ratio Decidendi

For the reasons published this day in the matter of Wride v Schulze (file number S 175 of 2002), except the reasons contained in paragraphs [48] to [52], the Court struck out the amended statement of claim and dismissed the applicant's application.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Pursuant to O 11 r16 the amended statement of claim is struck out.
  • Pursuant to O 20 r2 the applicant's application is dismissed.