Fuller, Donald v Minister for Primary Industries & Energy & Anor [1998] FCA 769

As the applicant's motion for a stay was dismissed, the costs of the motion should be paid by the applicant to the respondents.

Parties: Applicant: Donald Fuller; First Respondent: Minister for Primary Industries and Energy; Second Respondent: National Registration Authority
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 02 July 1998
Procedural Posture: Motion / Ruling on Costs After Dismissal of Motion
Outcome: Costs order against applicant
Legal Topics: Costs, Stay of Proceedings, Appeal Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Donald Fuller

Applicant

Minister for Primary Industries and Energy

First Respondent

National Registration Authority

Second Respondent

Motion / Ruling on Costs After Dismissal of Motion

1 Whether the applicant should pay the respondents' costs of the dismissed motion to stay a costs order

As the applicant's motion for a stay was dismissed, the costs of the motion should be paid by the applicant to the respondents.

Costs order against applicant

The applicant pay the first and second respondents' costs of the motion filed on 1 April 1997.