Greenbank v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 380

Greenbank v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 380

Consent should be granted to the proposed subdivision, subject to conditions addressing reasonable impacts on adjoining properties and drainage requirements, as indicated by the council and the evidence before the Court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Council Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
Outcome
appeal upheld; development application approved, subject to conditions
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'subdivision of Land']
['planning Law'] ['development Application' 'subdivision of Land']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Council Refusal of Development Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["whether a subdivision of the subject site that does not satisfy council's minimum lot requirements could be approved" 'whether reasonable impacts on adjoining properties are achieved' 'whether the imposition of drainage conditions is appropriate']

Ratio Decidendi

Consent should be granted to the proposed subdivision, subject to conditions addressing reasonable impacts on adjoining properties and drainage requirements, as indicated by the council and the evidence before the Court.

Court Disposition

appeal upheld; development application approved, subject to conditions

Orders

  • ['The appeal in respect of the property known as 1389 Princes Highway, Heathcote, is upheld.' "The development application for the subdivision of the above land submitted to Sutherland Shire Council, and as amended, is approved, subject to the conditions contained in Annexure 'A'." 'The exhibits, except for the...