The Estate of Janet Beris Jackwitz [2018] NSWSC 515
The court found that, notwithstanding maintenance of separate residences, the applicant and the deceased had a de facto relationship for over two decades based on the totality of evidence with respect to factors within s 21C of the Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), and thus the applicant was a spouse entitled to letters of administration and the whole intestate estate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Donald McKinnon; Deceased: Janet Beris Jackwitz
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Letters of Administration / Motion for Review of Registrar's Decision
- Outcome
- Registrar's decision set aside; letters of administration granted to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Intestacy, Letters of Administration, Definition of Spouse, De Facto Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donald McKinnon
Applicant
Janet Beris Jackwitz
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Application for Letters of Administration / Motion for Review of Registrar's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was in a 'domestic partnership' (specifically, a de facto relationship) with the deceased for the purposes of Succession Act 2006 (NSW) s 104(b), entitling him to the intestate estate under s 111.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, notwithstanding maintenance of separate residences, the applicant and the deceased had a de facto relationship for over two decades based on the totality of evidence with respect to factors within s 21C of the Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), and thus the applicant was a spouse entitled to letters of administration and the whole intestate estate.
Court Disposition
Registrar's decision set aside; letters of administration granted to applicant.
Orders
- Set aside the Registrar's decision of 15 March 2018.
- Declare that Donald McKinnon, as surviving de facto spouse, is entitled to the whole of the intestate estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment