Bagnall v D & R Enterprises Pty Ltd T/as EF Building Solutions & Ors [2022] NSWCATCD 198

Bagnall v D & R Enterprises Pty Ltd T/as EF Building Solutions & Ors [2022] NSWCATCD 198

The Tribunal retained jurisdiction as the District Court proceedings commenced after the Tribunal application. Transfer or stay of the proceedings was refused because transfer at a late stage would cause unnecessary delay and was inconsistent with the Tribunal's guiding principle.

Parties
Applicant: Donna Bagnall; Respondent: D & R Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as EF Building Solutions; Respondent: Daniel Antoon Reitsma
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Application for Transfer of Proceedings / Procedural Ruling
Outcome
Application to transfer proceedings refused; stay application refused.
Legal Topics
Transfer of Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Stay of Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donna Bagnall

Applicant

D & R Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as EF Building Solutions

Respondent

Daniel Antoon Reitsma

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Transfer of Proceedings / Procedural Ruling

  1. 1 Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to determine the Homeowner's application?
  2. 2 Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to determine the transfer application?
  3. 3 How should the Tribunal exercise its discretion on the transfer application?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal retained jurisdiction as the District Court proceedings commenced after the Tribunal application. Transfer or stay of the proceedings was refused because transfer at a late stage would cause unnecessary delay and was inconsistent with the Tribunal's guiding principle.

Court Disposition

Application to transfer proceedings refused; stay application refused.

Orders

  • The application to transfer the proceedings to the District Court is refused.
  • The application to stay the Tribunal proceedings is refused.