McVicar v Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd (No.2) [2024] NSWSC 606
The plaintiff's refusal to accept a genuine Calderbank offer that was more favourable than the outcome, combined with pursuing a hopeless case and the absence of any explanation for delay, made it unreasonable for the defendant to bear costs; thus, indemnity costs from the date of the offer were appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application After Dismissal of Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis from 21 September 2023.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'appeal From Local Court' 'leave to Appeal Out of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application After Dismissal of Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis following a rejected Calderbank offer more favourable than the judgment' 'Whether the conduct of the plaintiff justified indemnity costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's refusal to accept a genuine Calderbank offer that was more favourable than the outcome, combined with pursuing a hopeless case and the absence of any explanation for delay, made it unreasonable for the defendant to bear costs; thus, indemnity costs from the date of the offer were appropriate.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis from 21 September 2023.
Orders
- ["Order 2 of the Court's orders of 27 February 2024 varied to read: 'Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis from 21 September 2023.'"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment