Turner v NSW Forensic & Analytical Science Service [2017] NSWCATAD 181
The Tribunal found that while errors such as incorrect file numbers or inconsistent naming did occur, they were typographical or administrative and were promptly corrected; no evidence supported deliberate or contemptuous conduct by the Respondent or its representatives, and none of the allegations met the threshold for contempt under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Contempt Application Decision
- Outcome
- Application for contempt declined; no person found guilty of contempt.
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Tribunal' 'practice and Procedure Under Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Contempt Application Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conduct alleged by the applicant constitutes contempt of the Tribunal under s 73 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)' 'Whether there was misconduct such as providing incorrect file numbers, naming the Respondent inconsistently, or giving false evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that while errors such as incorrect file numbers or inconsistent naming did occur, they were typographical or administrative and were promptly corrected; no evidence supported deliberate or contemptuous conduct by the Respondent or its representatives, and none of the allegations met the threshold for contempt under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Application for contempt declined; no person found guilty of contempt.
Orders
- ['The Tribunal declines to exercise any power under s 199 of the District Court Act 1973 (NSW).' 'The Tribunal declines to refer any allegations of contempt to the Supreme Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment