Badman v Drake [2008] NSWSC 968
The balance of convenience favoured declining to require the Drakes to pay the balance of proceeds into court, as granting such an injunction would prevent them from defending the proceedings, particularly where they have a seriously arguable defence and some pre-existing equity in the property; limited injunction granted on terms agreed to by the Drakes.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Limited injunction granted; additional relief declined; costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['injunctions' 'proprietary Claims' 'resulting Trust' 'constructive Trust' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to grant an interlocutory injunction restraining the Drakes from dealing with proceeds of a real property transaction' 'Whether injunction should extend to require payment into court of remaining funds']
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of convenience favoured declining to require the Drakes to pay the balance of proceeds into court, as granting such an injunction would prevent them from defending the proceedings, particularly where they have a seriously arguable defence and some pre-existing equity in the property; limited injunction granted on terms agreed to by the Drakes.
Court Disposition
Limited injunction granted; additional relief declined; costs in the cause.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff granted leave to amend Notice of Motion.' 'Orders 2 and 3 in Short Minutes (not specified in text) made upon undertaking as to damages.' 'Balance of Motion stood over to Expedition List.' 'Defendants granted leave to issue subpoena to Dr Ann Lowe.' 'Abridgment of time for service of subpoena ordered.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment