Badman v Drake [2008] NSWSC 1366

Badman v Drake [2008] NSWSC 1366

The use of the plaintiff's funds to enable the first and second defendants to acquire property in their own names was a transaction procured in circumstances giving rise to a presumption of undue influence, and in the absence of proper independent advice or protection, must be set aside in equity; the appropriate remedy is repayment of the sum used with interest by way of equitable compensation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Equity Claim / Judgment After Hearing on Preliminary Issue
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff on the preliminary issue; order for equitable compensation.
Legal Topics
['undue Influence' 'elder Law' 'fiduciary Duty' 'equitable Compensation' 'resulting Trusts']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Claim / Judgment After Hearing on Preliminary Issue

  1. 1 ["Whether the transaction by which the plaintiff's funds were used to acquire property for the first and second defendants should be set aside for undue influence and/or equitable fraud" 'Whether the defendants breached fiduciary duties as joint attorneys' 'Whether the third and fourth defendants assisted in a dishonest and fraudulent design']

Ratio Decidendi

The use of the plaintiff's funds to enable the first and second defendants to acquire property in their own names was a transaction procured in circumstances giving rise to a presumption of undue influence, and in the absence of proper independent advice or protection, must be set aside in equity; the appropriate remedy is repayment of the sum used with interest by way of equitable compensation.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff on the preliminary issue; order for equitable compensation.

Orders

  • ['Order that the first and second defendants pay to the plaintiff equitable compensation of $378,623.19 plus interest at the court rate until judgment; amount to be charged on the relevant property.']