McKeown, Dorothy May v Repatriation Commission [1995] FCA 856
The Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider that short periods of service during which there was integral participation in activities directly intended for encounter with the enemy could satisfy s.6(1)(n), and by failing to recognize evidence which could support such findings. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for proper reconsideration.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['qualification for Operational Service' "interpretation of Veterans' Entitlements Act S.6(1)(n)"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Mr. McKeown rendered operational service within the meaning of s.6(1)(n) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986" "Proper interpretation of 'service in actual combat against the enemy' under s.6(1)(n)"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider that short periods of service during which there was integral participation in activities directly intended for encounter with the enemy could satisfy s.6(1)(n), and by failing to recognize evidence which could support such findings. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for proper reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 13 October 1993 set aside' 'Matter remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to be determined according to law' 'Each party granted leave to adduce further evidence before the Tribunal' "The applicant's costs of the appeal (including reserved costs) to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment