REGINA v. ODDIE [2001] NSWCCA 524
The trial judge failed to sufficiently articulate the applicant's culpable conduct or provide a reasoned basis to justify the severity of the sentence; in light of this and the applicant's subjective circumstances, the original sentences were quashed and replaced with lesser, concurrent sentences consistent with a lower range of culpability.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed and replaced.
- Legal Topics
- ['dangerous Driving' 'sentencing' 'appeal' 'culpability' 'disqualification From Driving']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trial judge properly identified and articulated the applicant's culpable conduct for sentencing purposes" 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the level of culpability']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge failed to sufficiently articulate the applicant's culpable conduct or provide a reasoned basis to justify the severity of the sentence; in light of this and the applicant's subjective circumstances, the original sentences were quashed and replaced with lesser, concurrent sentences consistent with a lower range of culpability.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed and replaced.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed' 'Sentences quashed' 'In lieu, on count 1: 16 months imprisonment with non-parole period of 8 months, commencing 11 April 2001' 'On counts 2 and 3: concurrent fixed terms of 8 months, commencing 11 April 2001' 'All sentences concurrent, for release on parole 10 December 2001' 'Disqualification from...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment