O'Brien v Doherty & Ors (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 447

O'Brien v Doherty & Ors (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 447

Mr O'Brien is not liable to pay Mr Doherty's costs in respect of the bills subject to assessment, and a nil assessment is substituted for the Costs Assessor's certificate pursuant to s 385(5) of the Legal Profession Act 2004.

Parties
Plaintiff: Douglas Ashley O'Brien; First Defendant: Peter Doherty; Second Defendant: Lloyd Lancaster Lawyers; Third Defendant: Geoffrey Rafter; Fourth Defendant: Law Society of NSW
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Appeal / Judgment Following Appeal and Further Mention
Outcome
Nil assessment substituted for Costs Assessor's certificate; consequential orders made.
Legal Topics
Costs Assessment, Appeal and Review, Substitution of Court Decision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas Ashley O'Brien

Plaintiff

Peter Doherty

First Defendant

Lloyd Lancaster Lawyers

Second Defendant

Geoffrey Rafter

Third Defendant

Law Society of NSW

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Costs Assessment Appeal / Judgment Following Appeal and Further Mention

  1. 1 Whether Mr O'Brien is liable to pay Mr Doherty's costs.
  2. 2 Whether the Court should substitute a nil assessment for the Costs Assessor's certificate.

Ratio Decidendi

Mr O'Brien is not liable to pay Mr Doherty's costs in respect of the bills subject to assessment, and a nil assessment is substituted for the Costs Assessor's certificate pursuant to s 385(5) of the Legal Profession Act 2004.

Court Disposition

Nil assessment substituted for Costs Assessor's certificate; consequential orders made.

Orders

  • A nil assessment is substituted for the Costs Assessor's certificate.
  • The parties must facilitate an application to set aside the Local Court judgment dated 26 July 2007 in proceedings 856 of 2007, with no order as to costs.