Inspector Graeme Aldred v Douglas Charles Crane [2008] NSWIRComm 238
Mr Crane was convicted because, as sole director and shareholder, he failed to ensure that fall protection, safe systems, adequate information, and supervision were provided for employees working at height, in breach of s 8(1) and s 26(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000. The breach was objectively serious, involving foreseeable risk and serious injury, not fully mitigated by existing safety measures or subsequent remedial steps.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Inspector Graeme Aldred; Defendant: Douglas Charles Crane
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Employer Duties, Workplace Safety, Formwork Hazards, Fall Protection, Deterrence, Penalty Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inspector Graeme Aldred
Prosecutor
Douglas Charles Crane
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 failure to ensure adequate fall protection for employees
- 2 failure to provide a safe system of work at heights
- 3 failure to provide adequate information and supervision for work at heights
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Crane was convicted because, as sole director and shareholder, he failed to ensure that fall protection, safe systems, adequate information, and supervision were provided for employees working at height, in breach of s 8(1) and s 26(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000. The breach was objectively serious, involving foreseeable risk and serious injury, not fully mitigated by existing safety measures or subsequent remedial steps.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Douglas Charles Crane convicted of breach of s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by operation of s 26(1)
- Fined $9,500 with half to be paid to the prosecutor by way of moiety
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment