CAMPBELL-STEPHEN v REGINA [2010] NSWCCA 204
The sentencing judge was correct in not attributing provocation to the victim for the purposes of s.21A(3)(c) and did not fail to consider mitigation where warranted; the sentence was within the appropriate range, the offence was properly assessed as mid-range seriousness, and there was no error warranting appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Douglas George Campbell-Stephen; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Provocation, Manifest Excess, Objective Seriousness of Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas George Campbell-Stephen
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in excluding provocation from the victim under s.21A(3)(c) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to give proper weight to provocation
- 3 Whether the offence was properly characterised as mid-range of objective seriousness
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was correct in not attributing provocation to the victim for the purposes of s.21A(3)(c) and did not fail to consider mitigation where warranted; the sentence was within the appropriate range, the offence was properly assessed as mid-range seriousness, and there was no error warranting appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal granted
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment