Kane v McClelland [1962] HCA 26
Ballot-papers not strictly complying with statutory requirements for numbering, in such a manner that the voter's intention is not unmistakably indicated, are informal and must not be counted as formal for purposes of Senate election scrutiny.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Reference to Full Court—determination of Question of Law
- Outcome
- Question referred to the Full Court answered No.
- Legal Topics
- ['senate Election' 'ballot Paper Formality' 'informal Ballot Papers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Reference to Full Court—determination of Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether certain classes of ballot-papers rejected as informal should have been counted as formal in ascertaining the result of the polling at the election']
Ratio Decidendi
Ballot-papers not strictly complying with statutory requirements for numbering, in such a manner that the voter's intention is not unmistakably indicated, are informal and must not be counted as formal for purposes of Senate election scrutiny.
Court Disposition
Question referred to the Full Court answered No.
Orders
- ['Costs of the reference to be dealt with by the Judge disposing of the petition']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment