McDOUGAL v CULLEN AND ANOR [1995] NSWCA 280

McDOUGAL v CULLEN AND ANOR [1995] NSWCA 280

By majority, the Court held that the approach of awarding a lump sum as a 'cushion' for future economic loss where present losses are speculative was appropriate and that the trial judge's allocation of $10,000, though low, was not appealably wrong. The assessment of 20% for non-economic loss was also affirmed as not shown to be erroneous.

Parties
Appellant: Douglas McDougal; Respondents: Neil Cullen and one other
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Loss of Earning Capacity, Non Economic Loss, Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Motor Vehicle Accidents
Tort Law Damages Loss of Earning Capacity Non Economic Loss Personal Injury Assessment of Damages Motor Vehicle Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas McDougal

Appellant

Neil Cullen and one other

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the allowance of $10,000 as a 'cushion' for future loss of earning capacity was erroneous or appealably inadequate
  2. 2 Whether non-economic loss assessed at 20% of a most extreme case under Motor Accidents Act 1988 s79 was correct

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the Court held that the approach of awarding a lump sum as a 'cushion' for future economic loss where present losses are speculative was appropriate and that the trial judge's allocation of $10,000, though low, was not appealably wrong. The assessment of 20% for non-economic loss was also affirmed as not shown to be erroneous.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs