Re Davies, Douglas Ronald & Anor [1983] FCA 234

Re Davies, Douglas Ronald & Anor [1983] FCA 234

The applications for discharge were premature because the public examinations had not been concluded by the Registrar; therefore, the requirements of s.150(1) had not been satisfied and objections to competency are upheld.

Parties
Applicant: Douglas Ronald Davies; Applicant: Jann Elizabeth Davies
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 September 1983
Procedural Posture
Application for Discharge of Bankruptcy / Final Order
Outcome
Objections to competency upheld; applications dismissed.
Legal Topics
Discharge of Bankruptcy, Public Examination Procedures, Premature Application
Bankruptcy Discharge of Bankruptcy Public Examination Procedures Premature Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas Ronald Davies

Applicant

Jann Elizabeth Davies

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Application for Discharge of Bankruptcy / Final Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applications for orders of discharge under s.150 of the Bankruptcy Act are competent given the status of public examinations

Ratio Decidendi

The applications for discharge were premature because the public examinations had not been concluded by the Registrar; therefore, the requirements of s.150(1) had not been satisfied and objections to competency are upheld.

Court Disposition

Objections to competency upheld; applications dismissed.

Orders

  • Objections to competency upheld.
  • Applications dismissed.