Downer EDI Limited v Gillies [2012] NSWCA 333
Mr Gillies engaged in serious misconduct sufficient to justify summary dismissal. Under the contract and the principle in Shepherd v Felt and Textiles, Downer was lawfully entitled to rely on later-discovered misconduct to withhold termination and bonus payments, despite the initial payment being made in lieu of notice rather than for misconduct. As a result, Mr Gillies was not entitled to termination payments, including payment in lieu of notice or additional contractual benefits. The phantom option scheme was validly ratified, and the car loan was non-recourse and secured against the vehicle only.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal, Decision on Appeal From Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Termination' 'bonuses on Termination' 'serious Misconduct' "directors' Duties" 'fiduciary Obligations' 'related Party Transactions' 'remuneration and Termination Payments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal, Decision on Appeal From Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent was entitled to termination payments and bonuses under his contract of employment given serious misconduct' "Whether the 'phantom option scheme' was valid and ratified" 'Whether Mr Gillies was indebted to the company for a car loan' 'Effect of serious misconduct discovered after termination on contractual termination payments']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Gillies engaged in serious misconduct sufficient to justify summary dismissal. Under the contract and the principle in Shepherd v Felt and Textiles, Downer was lawfully entitled to rely on later-discovered misconduct to withhold termination and bonus payments, despite the initial payment being made in lieu of notice rather than for misconduct. As a result, Mr Gillies was not entitled to termination payments, including payment in lieu of notice or additional contractual benefits. The phantom option scheme was validly ratified, and the car loan was non-recourse and secured against the vehicle only.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- ['Set aside the orders of the Supreme Court made on 9 September 2011.' 'Within 14 days, appellant to file agreed orders disposing of the appeal, or if no agreement, both parties to file draft short minutes with submissions of no more than three pages including as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment