Doyalson Wyee RSL Club Ltd & Ors v Liquor Administration Board of NSW & Anor [2007] NSWSC 910
Section 18(3) of the Gaming Machines Act prevails over s 15(5)(b), so the Board is not required to allocate poker machine entitlements in respect of s 88AF hardship machines. Such machines are instead to be treated as hardship gaming machines under the Act, and any conversion to entitlements can only occur after...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Doyalson Wyee RSL Club Limited; Plaintiff: Merrylands Bowling Sporting & Recreational Club Limited; Plaintiff: Lemon Tree Passage Bowling Club Co-Op Ltd; Plaintiff: Erina Rugby League Club Limited; First Defendant: Liquor Administration Board of NSW; Second Defendant: Attorney General of the State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- Summons in each matter dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Poker Machine Entitlements, Gaming Machines Regulation, Statutory Conflict Interpretation, Registered Clubs Hardship Approvals
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Doyalson Wyee RSL Club Limited
Plaintiff
Merrylands Bowling Sporting & Recreational Club Limited
Plaintiff
Lemon Tree Passage Bowling Club Co-Op Ltd
Plaintiff
Erina Rugby League Club Limited
Plaintiff
Liquor Administration Board of NSW
First Defendant
Attorney General of the State of New South Wales
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board was obliged under s 15 of the Gaming Machines Act 2001 to allocate poker machine entitlements for s 88AF hardship machines approved under the Registered Clubs Act 1976 during the freeze period.
- 2 How to resolve the apparent inconsistency between s 15(5)(b) and s 18(3) of the Gaming Machines Act 2001 as they apply to s 88AF hardship machines.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 18(3) of the Gaming Machines Act prevails over s 15(5)(b), so the Board is not required to allocate poker machine entitlements in respect of s 88AF hardship machines. Such machines are instead to be treated as hardship gaming machines under the Act, and any conversion to entitlements can only occur after following the procedures in s 31.
Court Disposition
Summons in each matter dismissed with costs
Orders
- The summons in each matter be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment