DPE v Public Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 285
Mr X's welfare and interests are best served by preserving his strong relationship with his wife; both the wife and daughter could adequately care for him, but the paramount consideration and relevant principles under the Guardianship Act and Administrative Decisions Review Act favour Mr X living in Shanghai with his wife.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Administrative Decision / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Respondent's decision set aside; substituted decision made.
- Legal Topics
- ['guardianship' 'welfare of Subject Person' "review of Public Guardian's Decision" 'residence Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Review of Administrative Decision / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether decision of Public Guardian that Mr X live in Taiwan with daughter or China with wife is in Mr X's best interests" 'Application of welfare and interests principles under Guardianship Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr X's welfare and interests are best served by preserving his strong relationship with his wife; both the wife and daughter could adequately care for him, but the paramount consideration and relevant principles under the Guardianship Act and Administrative Decisions Review Act favour Mr X living in Shanghai with his wife.
Court Disposition
Respondent's decision set aside; substituted decision made.
Orders
- ["The Respondent's decision made on 1 December 2017 is set aside." 'The Public Guardian consents to Mr X travelling to China for residential rehabilitation, followed by accommodation with his wife DPE in Shanghai.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment