R v GIBBON [2008] NSWDC 227
The offence of breaching an apprehended domestic violence order is made out where the defendant intentionally engages in prohibited conduct (harassing telephone calls), knowing there is an order, regardless of whether he intended to cause harassment or intimidation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Offence proved; charge dismissed without proceeding to conviction under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act.
- Legal Topics
- ['mens Rea' 'breach of Apprehended Domestic Violence Order' 'harassment' 'crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act S 10']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the necessary mens rea for breach of an apprehended domestic violence order under s 562ZG(1) of the Crimes Act 1900?' 'Does an intention to harass constitute the required mens rea or is mere intention to engage in the conduct sufficient?']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence of breaching an apprehended domestic violence order is made out where the defendant intentionally engages in prohibited conduct (harassing telephone calls), knowing there is an order, regardless of whether he intended to cause harassment or intimidation.
Court Disposition
Offence proved; charge dismissed without proceeding to conviction under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, offence proved but conviction not recorded; charge dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment