DQA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 2086

DQA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 2086

The Circuit Court judge did not make a jurisdictional error in refusing extension of time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act, as the applicant's grounds were properly considered and dismissed given their lack of merit; there was no denial of procedural fairness, no bias, and no constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias' 'extension of Time' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the Circuit Court judge made a jurisdictional error in refusing to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness by the Circuit Court judge' 'Whether the Circuit Court judge was biased or displayed apprehended bias' 'Whether the Circuit Court judge constructively failed to exercise jurisdiction' 'Whether the Circuit Court judge failed to consider relevant arguments regarding alleged jurisdictional errors by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal']

Ratio Decidendi

The Circuit Court judge did not make a jurisdictional error in refusing extension of time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act, as the applicant's grounds were properly considered and dismissed given their lack of merit; there was no denial of procedural fairness, no bias, and no constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs."]