Health Care Complaints Commission v Dr Della Bruna [2014] NSWCATOD 31
On admissions and evidence, Dr Della Bruna engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct in relation to record keeping, prescribing, and administering Schedule 8 drugs and restricted substances. The conduct was sufficiently serious but due to remorse, insight, rehabilitation efforts, and absence of current risk, suspension or cancellation of registration was not warranted. Protective conditions and a reprimand were sufficient to protect public safety and professional standards; costs were awarded to the complainant.
- Parties
- Complainant: Health Care Complaints Commission; Respondent: Dr Albina Della Bruna
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Proceedings / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Complaints proven; respondent reprimanded; conditions imposed; respondent to pay complainant’s costs.
- Legal Topics
- Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct, Professional Misconduct, Medical Record Keeping, Prescription of Schedule 8 Drugs, Conditions on Registration, Costs in Disciplinary Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health Care Complaints Commission
Complainant
Dr Albina Della Bruna
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceedings / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Della Bruna engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct by failing to properly record and account for Schedule 8 drugs and restricted substances
- 2 Whether Dr Della Bruna engaged in professional misconduct under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law
- 3 Appropriate protective orders given the conduct admitted
Ratio Decidendi
On admissions and evidence, Dr Della Bruna engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct in relation to record keeping, prescribing, and administering Schedule 8 drugs and restricted substances. The conduct was sufficiently serious but due to remorse, insight, rehabilitation efforts, and absence of current risk, suspension or cancellation of registration was not warranted. Protective conditions and a reprimand were sufficient to protect public safety and professional standards; costs were awarded to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Complaints proven; respondent reprimanded; conditions imposed; respondent to pay complainant’s costs.
Orders
- Dr Albina Della Bruna is reprimanded.
- Specified conditions are imposed on her registration restricting prescribing, supply, possession, or administration of Schedule 8 drugs except in hospitals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment