Collins v Clarence Valley Council (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 1735
The defendant's offer complied with UCPR r 20.26(2) and, in the circumstances, represented a genuine compromise. No compelling reason was shown to exercise the court’s discretion to order otherwise under UCPR r 42.15A(2). Thus, the defendant was entitled to costs on the ordinary basis up to and including 15 August 2012, and on the indemnity basis from 16 August 2012.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination Following Judgment / Post Trial (costs Orders)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay defendant’s costs as specified
- Legal Topics
- ['offer of Compromise' 'compliance With Uniform Civil Procedure Rules' 'costs Assessment' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination Following Judgment / Post Trial (costs Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant’s offer of compromise entitled it to indemnity costs from 16 August 2012 under UCPR r 42.15A' 'Whether the plaintiff’s refusal of the offer justified a different costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's offer complied with UCPR r 20.26(2) and, in the circumstances, represented a genuine compromise. No compelling reason was shown to exercise the court’s discretion to order otherwise under UCPR r 42.15A(2). Thus, the defendant was entitled to costs on the ordinary basis up to and including 15 August 2012, and on the indemnity basis from 16 August 2012.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay defendant’s costs as specified
Orders
- ["The Plaintiff pay the Defendant's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis up to and including 15 August 2012." "The Plaintiff pay the Defendant's costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis from 16 August 2012."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment