Schlebaum -v- Director General, Department of Community Services and Gliksman [2001] NSWADT 97
The Tribunal determined that whether Dr Schlebaum is an 'interested person' depends on whether the agency should have consulted her as the documents may relate to her personal or business affairs; the preliminary issue of whether the documents contain such information must be determined at hearing before further procedural questions can be addressed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Preliminary Matter
- Outcome
- Matter set down for hearing of preliminary question
- Legal Topics
- ['access to Documents' 'freedom of Information' 'personal Affairs' 'business Affairs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Preliminary Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Dr Schlebaum is an 'interested person' entitled to review under s 55 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997" "Whether Dr Schlebaum's application for review was lodged within time as prescribed under the relevant statutes" "Whether the documents in dispute relate to Dr Schlebaum's personal or business affairs"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that whether Dr Schlebaum is an 'interested person' depends on whether the agency should have consulted her as the documents may relate to her personal or business affairs; the preliminary issue of whether the documents contain such information must be determined at hearing before further procedural questions can be addressed.
Court Disposition
Matter set down for hearing of preliminary question
Orders
- ["The matter is set down for a hearing on the preliminary question of whether the documents in dispute contain information relating to Dr Schlebaum's personal or business affairs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment