Health Care Complaints Commission v Dr Annette Dao Quynh Do (No. 2) [2013] NSWMT 11
Application to redact the name of the deceased patient refused, as principles of open justice outweigh privacy considerations in this case without clear indication of the family's wishes to suppress publication.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Decision on Application to Redact Name of Deceased Patient
- Outcome
- Application to redact name of deceased patient refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['open Justice' 'privacy' 'suppression Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Decision on Application to Redact Name of Deceased Patient
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the tribunal should redact/anonymise the name of a deceased patient in its published decision.']
Ratio Decidendi
Application to redact the name of the deceased patient refused, as principles of open justice outweigh privacy considerations in this case without clear indication of the family's wishes to suppress publication.
Court Disposition
Application to redact name of deceased patient refused.
Orders
- ['Refuse application to redact name of deceased patient.' 'Direct a copy of these remarks be placed on the Case Law website.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment