Dr B v Local Health District [2018] NSWIRComm 1037

Dr B v Local Health District [2018] NSWIRComm 1037

On the balance of probabilities, Dr B performed a surgical procedure (narrowing/obliteration of the vagina/colpocleisis) not consented to in writing, failed to provide sufficient detail in operating notes, and did not comply with mandatory documentation or consent policies. The surgical complication was not...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Application / Merits Hearing and Final Determination
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['unfair Dismissal' 'misconduct' 'informed Consent' 'medical Record Keeping' 'reinstatement' 'medical Practitioner Discipline']
['employment Law' 'health Law'] ['unfair Dismissal' 'misconduct' 'informed Consent' 'medical Record Keeping' 'reinstatement' 'medical Practitioner Discipline']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Unfair Dismissal Application / Merits Hearing and Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Dr B was unfairly dismissed for misconduct in relation to surgical procedures and documentation on 5 December 2014' 'Whether the dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable under s 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW)' 'Whether procedural fairness was afforded in the dismissal process']

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, Dr B performed a surgical procedure (narrowing/obliteration of the vagina/colpocleisis) not consented to in writing, failed to provide sufficient detail in operating notes, and did not comply with mandatory documentation or consent policies. The surgical complication was not life-threatening; there was no justification for proceeding without explicit consent. The LHD had a valid and reasonable basis for the dismissal. The dismissal was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application made by Dr B pursuant to s.84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 is dismissed.']